Publications

  • bioRxiv Preprint | Experiment 1 Results

    Cogitate Consortium, et al. (2023) An adversarial collaboration to critically evaluate theories of consciousness. doi:10.1101/2023.06.23.546249

    IMPORTANT NOTE: An update to this preprint has been published and now includes a series of updated citations

  • PLoS ONE Methods Paper

    Melloni L, Mudrik L, Pitts M, Bendtz K, Ferrante O, Gorska U, et al. (2023) An adversarial collaboration protocol for testing contrasting predictions of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theory. PLoS ONE 18(2): e0268577. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268577

  • Preregistration Amendment v4.0

    This preregistration was amended following the development of data analyses based on the first ⅓ of the data for Experiment 1.

    doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/92TBG

  • FLUX: A pipeline for MEG analysis

    Ferrante O, Luo L, Tamas T, Gorska U, Ghafari T, Luo H, Jensen O (2022) NeuroImage doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119047

    FLUX: A pipeline for MEG analysis
  • The ConTraSt database for analysing and comparing empirical studies of consciousness theories

    Yaron I, Melloni L, Pitts M, Mudrik L (2022) Nat Hum Behav
    doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01284-5

    ConTraSt database
  • OSF - Preregistration

    An open-science adversarial collaboration aimed at arbitrating between two leading theories of consciousness: Global Neuronal Workspace (GNW) and Integrated Information Theory (IIT)

  • Making the Hard Problem of Consciousness Easier

    Melloni L, Mudrik L, Pitts M & Koch K (2021) Making the hard problem of consciousness easier. Science372,911-912(2021).DOI:10.1126/science.abj3259

We aim for all COGITATE publications to be open and accessible.